The Fall of Arthur for Kindle on Amazon.com
Login
Username:

Password:

remember me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Collector's Guide Table of Contents
Recent Visitors

gilraen
19 minutes ago

wellinghall
50 minutes ago

Morgan
1 hour 16 minutes ago

Trotter
2 hours 7 minutes ago

Khaműl
2 hours 43 minutes ago

Findegil
4 hours 8 minutes ago

Jlong
5 hours 22 minutes ago

Stu
10 hours 12 minutes ago
Report message: *
 
* = Required

Re: Tolkien and the Moberly–Jourdain incident

Subject: Re: Tolkien and the Moberly–Jourdain incident
by garm on 2010/11/28 3:23:41

I have a copy; though I'm afraid it's still on my 'to read' list. However, taking it down from the shelf, I see that Flieger mentions that an account of the incident was published in 1911, and that Tolkien 'could have' been aware of it. Flieger uses the phrase 'could have' twice in a very short space of time, in a quite densely-packed passage.

I'm afraid I don't have the time at present to do the Professor's argument justice, but for now I'd say that the 'Moberly–Jourdain incident' had about as much 'influence' on Tolkien's works as did the Cottingley fairies, which is to say, none at all.

Though I could be wrong.