The Fall of Arthur for Kindle on Amazon.com
Login
Username:

Password:

remember me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Collector's Guide Table of Contents
Recent Visitors

Findegil
46 minutes ago

FreiWild
1 hour 25 minutes ago

Trotter
2 hours 7 minutes ago

Aelfwine
2 hours 19 minutes ago

gilraen
2 hours 23 minutes ago

wellinghall
4 hours 37 minutes ago

Jlong
6 hours 51 minutes ago

Glorfindel
7 hours 49 minutes ago
Report message: *
 
* = Required

Re: Misprint?

Subject: Re: Misprint?
by garm on 2011/1/9 8:31:31

"Either way, in Tolkien book collecting (& I guess collecting of modern first editions generally) flawed books (misprints, binding faults, pages folded in printing process, previous ownership marks, bookplates, inscriptions, marginalia etc) are fairly looked down upon; unfairly I think. Come a certain age, books with inscriptions & the like can be (should be!) of great interest.
"
I wouldn't put books with production faults in the same category as books with marginalia. Books with deformed or missing pages are 'wrong', and ought to be returned to the vendor, IMO.

Whereas, with marginalia - it depends on whoever made the notes, I think; and their relationship (if any) with JRR. I have a cracking example, once owned by Tolkien's colleague G.V. Smithers.