Login

Or
Register Now


Already have an account?
Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost Your Password?
Main Menu
Collector's Guide Table of Contents
Recent Visitors

Trotter
11 minutes ago

wellinghall
17 minutes ago

tolkienbrasil
1 hour 38 minutes ago

Karl
2 hours 25 minutes ago

Khamûl
7 hours 10 minutes ago

Jlong
7 hours 58 minutes ago

Deagol
12 hours 6 minutes ago

Stu
19 hours 17 minutes ago
Report message: *
 
* = Required

Re: New Book Releases

Subject: Re: New Book Releases
by Khamûl on 2013/6/2 8:16:43

I don't personally like the cover either & agree with Elwë in his assessment of its modern design, and perceived appeal. I've always thought it perilous to depict some of the characters in any great detail, particularly facially. Never liked illustrations depicting Hobbits.

That said, if you look at some of her other work (I don't think the calendar cover, for example, looks that appealing; but the black & white stuff she does are of a style I quite like [--see below]) you can see why they might have picked her to illustrate: nothing like Lee or Howe or Nasmith; female; British; etc. I like her depiction/focus on animals; so very apt for The Hobbit. I know not everyone is going to agree with this (& there are probably reasons why this hasn't happened), but I think a H illustrated by Ruth Lacon would have been good; her best work (in the bestiary style) is very, very good. I think it would have suited Tolkien's text well.

BH