Login

Or
Register Now


Already have an account?
Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost Your Password?
Main Menu
Collector's Guide Table of Contents
Recent Visitors

Stu
1 hour 17 minutes ago

Urulöké
3 hours 5 minutes ago

Velmeran
3 hours 10 minutes ago

Halla
3 hours 23 minutes ago

Berelach
3 hours 28 minutes ago

Karl
3 hours 34 minutes ago

Findegil
3 hours 36 minutes ago

Morinehtar
4 hours 4 minutes ago


(1) 2 3 4 ... 2414 »


Re: The Wonders of...
Shirrif
Joined:
2006/6/5 22:04
From Essex, England
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 1841
Offline
A leather rebound 23rd Impression of the 1991 Alan Lee illustrated Lord of the Rings

Why?

eBay Item #291887622564

Posted on: Today 6:27:53


Re: New Book Releases
Shirrif
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
From Queenstown, New Zealand
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 958
Offline

Morinehtar wrote:
Does that mean they will print the name with the correct spelling or reproduce the ink mark?


Will be as per the original jacket. The name will be misspelled and have the ink mark printed over the 'e'. Hand correcting after printing wasn't an economic option, for obvious reasons. They didn't ever intend to correct the spelling, the question was down to whether to print the ink mark or leave that to the customer to add themselves if they wanted to. Myself and Trotter's view was very much that the ink mark should be printed.

The question of what to correct is an interesting one. On the version I initially supplied to HC, I had left the right and left borders slightly off vertical (basically the whole thing should be slightly off square). They slightly corrected that misalignment on the left [albeit it is still off square], which is technically not correct, but probably does look better when printed). The number of people that know it should be slightly off square is quite small, but the number of people that would think it was printed wrongly (if done accurately) is quite high. I didn't feel strongly about it, and assuming that was the version they went with, I don't think it was a bad call.

At the end of the day, if you want something that is absolutely bibliographically correct, you need to buy an original (and spend an extra 20,000 pounds!).

Posted on: Today 1:31:30

(edited)


Re: New Book Releases
Not too shy to talk
Joined:
9/1 20:11:04
Group:
Shirefolk
Posts: 25
Offline
Does that mean they will print the name with the correct spelling or reproduce the ink mark?

Posted on: Today 1:10:09


Re: New Book Releases
Shirrif
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
From Queenstown, New Zealand
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 958
Offline

Morinehtar wrote:
Interesting reference to Alice in Wonderland in the original DJ. Hard to imagine a time when Tolkien was unknown and his publisher used this sort of comparison.


79 Years is a long time! Note that "Dodgeson" has the "e" inked out with pen. There was a bit of discussion as to whether they would go without the pen correction, but (assuming nothing changed last minute, of course), the jacket will have the ink correction (it would have been very odd to have not had it, given all the 1937 copies were corrected in this way before leaving the printers).

Posted on: Today 0:37:15


Re: New Book Releases
Not too shy to talk
Joined:
9/1 20:11:04
Group:
Shirefolk
Posts: 25
Offline
Interesting reference to Alice in Wonderland in the original DJ. Hard to imagine a time when Tolkien was unknown and his publisher used this sort of comparison.

Posted on: Today 0:29:20



 Top
(1) 2 3 4 ... 2414 »




© 2015 TolkienGuide.com and respective authors. Contact Us