Login

Or
Register Now


Already have an account?
Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost Your Password?
Main Menu
Collector's Guide Table of Contents
Recent Visitors

Jlong
3 hours 19 minutes ago

tolkienbrasil
4 hours 25 minutes ago

Karl
6 hours 55 minutes ago

Urulöké
7 hours 34 minutes ago

wellinghall
9 hours 5 minutes ago

Deagol
11 hours 7 minutes ago

Morgan
12 hours 8 minutes ago

Trotter
17 hours 23 minutes ago


« 1 ... 1666 1667 1668 (1669) 1670 1671 1672 ... 1951 »


Re: We have pleasure in sending the accompanying book for review...
Shirrif
Joined:
2007/8/16 4:56
From Scotland
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 1455
Offline
Good stuff...

I'm not suggesting the review copy I have is any different from any other Billing copies of The Silmarillion; it is identical as far as I can see. But it is a Billing copy, and I was just curious (if it were possible to determine) how pre-publication it was. Likewise if dates could be put on the Clowes dummy copies it could help build a clearer picture of printing priority between different printers i.e. the old Clowes were in production first as they had to be shipped abroad chestnut.

Rowns, a US HoME copy of Lays just went on eBay for about £30; it was some sort of uncorrected proof copy (as you mention)...

Remy, can I get that 1998 Silmarillion 'Review' copy of you have?


BH

Posted on: 2008/6/18 11:05
_________________
You drive a hard bargain – you can have it for £10 all-in – one consolation (for you) is that you do not have to hear the cries of my children, for bread...
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Bloomsbury Auctions Announces Sale of Literature and Modern Firsts
Home away from home
Joined:
2006/11/24 11:12
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 621
Offline
Bloomsbury Auctions Announces Sale of Literature and Modern Firsts

"The sale also features some of the most beloved works of fantasy in modern literature, J.R.R. Tolkien's The Hobbit ($22,000-$28,000) and The Lord of the Rings ($18,000-$20,000)."

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/sh ... erature-and-modern-firsts,434658.shtml

Posted on: 2008/6/18 1:56
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: We have pleasure in sending the accompanying book for review...
Home away from home
Joined:
2006/11/24 11:12
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 621
Offline
My wife's grandmother was a book reviewer. We have her review copies of LotR. As far as I can tell, these are identical to the normal first edition / first impression (although I have never done a detailed, point-by-point comparison).

Posted on: 2008/6/16 5:17
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: We have pleasure in sending the accompanying book for review...
Thain
Joined:
2006/5/26 20:36
From California, USA
Group:
Thain
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 1146
Offline
I've seen all sorts of "review copies" out of HarperCollins and Houghton Mifflin over the years. In my mind an Advance Reading Copy (ARC) is the first edition gatherings perfect bound (glued into paper wraps) rather than case-bound into the hardcover form. In modern terms (the digital age), there is no difficulty in changing the text in the few weeks or perhaps months between when the ARC is sent out for comment and when the first edition is printed, so it is not unusual to have changes between the two. It used to be (back in the day of setting type in blocks for printing) that there was no difference at all between the review copy and the first edition, as there was not time to reset anything between the two.

The above is just my opinion, though. There is no hard-and-fast definition for ARC. It can mean either a proof or galley copy sent out for comment, or a first edition sent out early to allow the book to be read and reviewed by the time the book becomes publicly available. I have seen ARCs that specifically state on the wraps that they are not the final text to be published.

ABC for Book Collectors by John Carter and Nicolas Barker, now in 8th edition, is an excellent resource for terminology such as this. It says for Advance Copy: "...are normally either final proofs or the first sheets to be gathered of the main run...." So it doesn't call one out as preferred over the other either.

It does say that a Review Copy is usually a first edition copy with a slip laid in or some other marking on it (no mention of proof's being sent as a Review Copy.)

It also says for Proofs that "Whereas the bibliographical distinction between wrappered final proofs and Advance Copies is significant, the physical differences are often slight, or non-existent."

ABC is a great reference (and even a great read, as there are a lot of tongue-in-cheek references or in-jokes scattered throughout), and significant portions of the book are self-referential - for example, the Paste-Down Endpaper is labeled as such, so you know exactly what one is.

Posted on: 2008/6/15 20:53
_________________
- Jeremy
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: We have pleasure in sending the accompanying book for review...
Home away from home
Joined:
2006/6/6 5:20
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 182
Offline

For the review copies (Advance Reading Copies or ARCs for short) that I have seen for the HOME series, they are mostly non-finished text bound in simple paper wrappers - clearly sent out much further in advance than the Silmarillion copy I saw.


Hi Rowns,

I presume technically speaking, that these would really be Uncorrected Proof Copies as opposed to Review Copies.

I do not know the strict definitions, and although a 'Proof' copy may be sent out for review, I would consider a 'Review' copy to be identical to the regular trade edition, whereas a 'Proof' copy may be bound differently and have many textual differences - and be an earlier state of the edition?

But I would think it important to distinguish between a 'Review' and 'Proof' Copy.

Have I got this right or are there circumstances whereby an ARC would have textual differences to the First Trade Printing?

Remy.

Posted on: 2008/6/15 15:27
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer



 Top
« 1 ... 1666 1667 1668 (1669) 1670 1671 1672 ... 1951 »