Login

Or
Register Now


Already have an account?
Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost Your Password?
Main Menu
Collector's Guide Table of Contents
Recent Visitors

Findegil
32 minutes ago

laurel
54 minutes ago

Trotter
2 hours 29 minutes ago

wellinghall
3 hours 7 minutes ago

Stu
4 hours 32 minutes ago

Khamûl
15 hours 48 minutes ago

Morgan
18 hours 46 minutes ago

Beren
19 hours 39 minutes ago


« 1 ... 1802 1803 1804 (1805) 1806 1807 1808 ... 2087 »


Re: Help: Tolkien Deluxe Edition Collection Possibilities?
Just can't stay away
Joined:
2006/10/23 16:28
From Tolkien Society Unquendor in the Netherlands
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 97
Offline
The Unfinished Tales is best regarded as volume 0 of The History of Middle-earth (or volume 13, depending on your point of view). The Children of Húrin is actually the expansion of one chapter from The Silmarillion, most of its material having already appeared in Unfinished Tales or History 10&11. So they're both closely related.

Perilous Realm is not closely related. It contains 'fairy stories' not set in M-e. But they're still related to Tolkien's philosophic concept of mythology and fairy stories that is also behind M-e.

Posted on: 2008/6/20 20:33
_________________
Then in the name of the king, go and find some old man of less lore and more wisdom who keeps some in his house! - Gandalf in Minas Tirith [LR 5 VIII:70]


Re: We have pleasure in sending the accompanying book for review...
Shirrif
Joined:
2007/8/16 4:56
From Scotland
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 1519
Offline
Good stuff...

I'm not suggesting the review copy I have is any different from any other Billing copies of The Silmarillion; it is identical as far as I can see. But it is a Billing copy, and I was just curious (if it were possible to determine) how pre-publication it was. Likewise if dates could be put on the Clowes dummy copies it could help build a clearer picture of printing priority between different printers i.e. the old Clowes were in production first as they had to be shipped abroad chestnut.

Rowns, a US HoME copy of Lays just went on eBay for about £30; it was some sort of uncorrected proof copy (as you mention)...

Remy, can I get that 1998 Silmarillion 'Review' copy of you have?


BH

Posted on: 2008/6/18 11:05
_________________
You drive a hard bargain – you can have it for £10 all-in – one consolation (for you) is that you do not have to hear the cries of my children, for bread...


Bloomsbury Auctions Announces Sale of Literature and Modern Firsts
Home away from home
Joined:
2006/11/24 11:12
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 640
Offline
Bloomsbury Auctions Announces Sale of Literature and Modern Firsts

"The sale also features some of the most beloved works of fantasy in modern literature, J.R.R. Tolkien's The Hobbit ($22,000-$28,000) and The Lord of the Rings ($18,000-$20,000)."

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/sh ... erature-and-modern-firsts,434658.shtml

Posted on: 2008/6/18 1:56


Re: We have pleasure in sending the accompanying book for review...
Home away from home
Joined:
2006/11/24 11:12
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 640
Offline
My wife's grandmother was a book reviewer. We have her review copies of LotR. As far as I can tell, these are identical to the normal first edition / first impression (although I have never done a detailed, point-by-point comparison).

Posted on: 2008/6/16 5:17


Re: We have pleasure in sending the accompanying book for review...
Thain
Joined:
2006/5/26 20:36
From California, USA
Group:
Thain
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 1203
Offline
I've seen all sorts of "review copies" out of HarperCollins and Houghton Mifflin over the years. In my mind an Advance Reading Copy (ARC) is the first edition gatherings perfect bound (glued into paper wraps) rather than case-bound into the hardcover form. In modern terms (the digital age), there is no difficulty in changing the text in the few weeks or perhaps months between when the ARC is sent out for comment and when the first edition is printed, so it is not unusual to have changes between the two. It used to be (back in the day of setting type in blocks for printing) that there was no difference at all between the review copy and the first edition, as there was not time to reset anything between the two.

The above is just my opinion, though. There is no hard-and-fast definition for ARC. It can mean either a proof or galley copy sent out for comment, or a first edition sent out early to allow the book to be read and reviewed by the time the book becomes publicly available. I have seen ARCs that specifically state on the wraps that they are not the final text to be published.

ABC for Book Collectors by John Carter and Nicolas Barker, now in 8th edition, is an excellent resource for terminology such as this. It says for Advance Copy: "...are normally either final proofs or the first sheets to be gathered of the main run...." So it doesn't call one out as preferred over the other either.

It does say that a Review Copy is usually a first edition copy with a slip laid in or some other marking on it (no mention of proof's being sent as a Review Copy.)

It also says for Proofs that "Whereas the bibliographical distinction between wrappered final proofs and Advance Copies is significant, the physical differences are often slight, or non-existent."

ABC is a great reference (and even a great read, as there are a lot of tongue-in-cheek references or in-jokes scattered throughout), and significant portions of the book are self-referential - for example, the Paste-Down Endpaper is labeled as such, so you know exactly what one is.

Posted on: 2008/6/15 20:53
_________________
- Jeremy



 Top
« 1 ... 1802 1803 1804 (1805) 1806 1807 1808 ... 2087 »