Login

Or
Register Now


Already have an account?
Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost Your Password?
Main Menu
Collector's Guide Table of Contents
Recent Visitors

Stu
1 hour 1 minute ago

Berelach
1 hour 35 minutes ago

Trotter
2 hours 47 minutes ago

Karl
9 hours 3 minutes ago

Findegil
10 hours 2 minutes ago

onthetrail
10 hours 49 minutes ago

Halla
10 hours 59 minutes ago

Khamûl
11 hours 40 minutes ago
   All Posts (Urulöké)


« 1 ... 180 181 182 (183) 184 185 186 ... 258 »


Re: Gene Wolfe essay
Thain
Joined:
2006/5/26 20:36
From Oregon, USA
Group:
Thain
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 1398
Offline
Andy Robertson from Interzone mentions that the "essay was offered by Mr Wolfe to the anthology Meditations on Middle-Earth, edited by Karen Haber, but was rejected."

Perhaps that is what you are thinking of? I don't have the Interzone edition, so if there is more information in that article I would like to know!

Posted on: 2008/7/10 9:59
_________________
- Jeremy


Gene Wolfe essay
Thain
Joined:
2006/5/26 20:36
From Oregon, USA
Group:
Thain
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 1398
Offline
Noted fantasy author Gene Wolfe wrote a tribute essay about J. R. R. Tolkien and The Lord of the Rings which I quite enjoyed reading. It was first published in 2001 in the magazine Interzone, and was reprinted with permission on the following website:

http://home.clara.net/andywrobertson/wolfemountains.html

Posted on: 2008/7/8 23:06
_________________
- Jeremy


Re: Postcard addressed to Tolkien found
Thain
Joined:
2006/5/26 20:36
From Oregon, USA
Group:
Thain
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 1398
Offline
I have a sneaking suspicion that Beren is hot on its trail. Quote from the article:

"He has already had offers from a Tolkien enthusiast in Belgium..."

Posted on: 2008/7/8 9:26
_________________
- Jeremy


Re: Quiet in here
Thain
Joined:
2006/5/26 20:36
From Oregon, USA
Group:
Thain
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 1398
Offline
I know what you mean that it is quiet here and elsewhere, but I've been so swamped at work that I haven't had time to post new content here lately. Much to come though!

Non-Tolkien related: I hate myself on video, and I say "um" way too much (the boss threw me in front of the camera with no warning or prep), but if you really want to see my ugly mug...

http://newteevee.com/2008/06/27/activ ... tworks-moves-beyond-stbs/

Posted on: 2008/6/30 21:38
_________________
- Jeremy


Re: We have pleasure in sending the accompanying book for review...
Thain
Joined:
2006/5/26 20:36
From Oregon, USA
Group:
Thain
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 1398
Offline
I've seen all sorts of "review copies" out of HarperCollins and Houghton Mifflin over the years. In my mind an Advance Reading Copy (ARC) is the first edition gatherings perfect bound (glued into paper wraps) rather than case-bound into the hardcover form. In modern terms (the digital age), there is no difficulty in changing the text in the few weeks or perhaps months between when the ARC is sent out for comment and when the first edition is printed, so it is not unusual to have changes between the two. It used to be (back in the day of setting type in blocks for printing) that there was no difference at all between the review copy and the first edition, as there was not time to reset anything between the two.

The above is just my opinion, though. There is no hard-and-fast definition for ARC. It can mean either a proof or galley copy sent out for comment, or a first edition sent out early to allow the book to be read and reviewed by the time the book becomes publicly available. I have seen ARCs that specifically state on the wraps that they are not the final text to be published.

ABC for Book Collectors by John Carter and Nicolas Barker, now in 8th edition, is an excellent resource for terminology such as this. It says for Advance Copy: "...are normally either final proofs or the first sheets to be gathered of the main run...." So it doesn't call one out as preferred over the other either.

It does say that a Review Copy is usually a first edition copy with a slip laid in or some other marking on it (no mention of proof's being sent as a Review Copy.)

It also says for Proofs that "Whereas the bibliographical distinction between wrappered final proofs and Advance Copies is significant, the physical differences are often slight, or non-existent."

ABC is a great reference (and even a great read, as there are a lot of tongue-in-cheek references or in-jokes scattered throughout), and significant portions of the book are self-referential - for example, the Paste-Down Endpaper is labeled as such, so you know exactly what one is.

Posted on: 2008/6/15 20:53
_________________
- Jeremy



 Top
« 1 ... 180 181 182 (183) 184 185 186 ... 258 »




© 2016 TolkienGuide.com and respective authors. Contact Us