Login

Or
Register Now


Already have an account?
Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost Your Password?
Main Menu
Collector's Guide Table of Contents
Recent Visitors

Trotter
4 minutes ago

Earl
4 minutes ago

Khamûl
1 hour 8 minutes ago

wellinghall
2 hours 12 minutes ago

Qweniden
4 hours 54 minutes ago

Tolkieniano
4 hours 54 minutes ago

Karl
7 hours 40 minutes ago

Findegil
10 hours 2 minutes ago
   All Posts (Trotter)


« 1 2 3 (4) 5 6 7 ... 354 »


Re: Question: Michael Tolkien Signed Book
Shirrif
Joined:
2006/6/5 22:04
From Essex, England
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 1961
Offline
Are you sure that this is a Michael Tolkien signature, never seen him sign his name like this.

Posted on: 2/8 1:55:52


Re: Dr Tom Shippey on Beowulf
Shirrif
Joined:
2006/6/5 22:04
From Essex, England
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 1961
Offline
I have posted all three videos now, and they are very good apart from a technical problem in the first video with the webcam, I ended up just listening to the audio from Dr Shippey.

Posted on: 2/8 0:24:12


Re: Pictures by JRRT vs. Art of LOTR?
Shirrif
Joined:
2006/6/5 22:04
From Essex, England
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 1961
Offline

St. Troy wrote:
Both Pictures by J.R.R. Tolkien and The Art of The Lord of The Rings contain JRRT's artwork for LOTR. How do they compare to each other? Does one have more images? Any quality issues?


These are very different books, Pictures by J.R.R. Tolkien was the first book to come out, apart from yearly calendars, that contained Tolkien's illustrations, but has been very much superseded by Scull & Hammond's excellent three books on Tolkien's illustrations, J.R.R. Tolkien: Artist and Illustrator, The Art of the Hobbit and The Art of the Lord of Rings.

To answer your question on images, a lot more in these books and a much more comprehensive description about the images than is in Pictures by J.R.R. Tolkien, and on quality, all four are very good.

From a Tolkien as an illustrator point of view, I would go for Scull & Hammond's books first, but as a collector then all four of them.

Posted on: 2/7 4:40:46

(edited)


Re: Complete Guide vs. Complete Companion?
Shirrif
Joined:
2006/6/5 22:04
From Essex, England
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 1961
Offline

Urulöké wrote:
As an additional note - I tend not to use Foster/Tyler any more because I have been spending much time in the Reader's Guide and Reader's Companion volumes from Scull/Hammond. Well worth getting! Not exactly the same purpose, though.


I have to agree with Urulöké, I have both of these books but tend to use Scull & Hammond's excellent Reader's Guide and Reader's Companion.

If you don't have a copy then a revised edition is coming out later this year, probably in September

https://wayneandchristina.wordpress.co ... mpanion-and-guide-2nd-ed/

Posted on: 2/5 6:05:39


Re: Black and white cover of early american hobbit?
Shirrif
Joined:
2006/6/5 22:04
From Essex, England
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 1961
Offline

dunedain wrote:
Hi Trotter,

IMO its awfully hard to be better than the UK 1st or 2nd impressions. But, I do like the larger size of the US. Made for more comfortable reading, to me.


I had forgotten about that, and you are right, I also like the larger font size of the US edition

Posted on: 2/4 4:32:32



 Top
« 1 2 3 (4) 5 6 7 ... 354 »




© 2016 TolkienGuide.com and respective authors. Contact Us