Login

Or
Register Now


Already have an account?
Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost Your Password?
Main Menu
Collector's Guide Table of Contents
Recent Visitors

Trotter
15 minutes ago

Findegil
9 hours 36 minutes ago

Khamûl
10 hours 50 minutes ago

Berelach
14 hours 13 minutes ago

Peeta
15 hours 9 minutes ago

wellinghall
15 hours 23 minutes ago

Laurin666
18 hours 28 minutes ago

Earl
22 hours 50 minutes ago


« 1 ... 66 67 68 (69) 70 71 72 ... 171 »


Re: UK Book and Magazine Collector magazine
Shirrif
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
From Queenstown, New Zealand
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 897
Offline

Trotter wrote:

Urulöké wrote:
Thanks Trotter!

Is this a typo (extra zero on #5)?
The Lord of the Rings (Deluxe India Paper Edition 1969)
http://www.tolkienbooks.net/php/details.php?reference=45150
#1 n/a(n/a) #2 n/a(n/a) #3 £50(n/a) #4 £100(n/a) #5 £2000(n/a)


It may be a typo in the magazine, does seem a huge increase.


2000 pounds certainly doesn't seem to reflect the price that it would normally sell at (although conversely 200 pounds would seem to be a bit low).

Posted on: 2014/7/16 22:30


Re: UK Book and Magazine Collector magazine
Shirrif
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
From Queenstown, New Zealand
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 897
Offline
If only I had had six hundred quid lying around when I was 14, I'd have been sorted :)

Posted on: 2014/7/16 15:46


Re: Recommendations for Tolkien facsimile dust jackets
Shirrif
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
From Queenstown, New Zealand
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 897
Offline
Here are the 4th Impression versions in low res. My final (which has been refined a lot since I printed my copy -- I might reprint on the correct type of paper stock at some point when I am in a decent sized city or I visit a first world country) and Trotter's genuine copy.

If you compare the originals between the 1st impression and the 4th, a LOT of differences (and I'm not just talking about the text on the flaps). I think most of the differences come out of the alignment of the plates when printing the three colours (with the white obviously being the paper showing through). The white layer between the feet of the front row of trees shows clearly the kinds of difference between the impressions, in case anyone is interested. I didn't get that layer quite thick enough on my version, but my journey into the heart of darkness is complete, so it will have to do!

[Edit 17/03/16. As an endless tinkerer, I reset the front flap yet again, adjusting the interline spacing, changing the uppercase "W" characters, fixing a missing "-", swapping an inverted comma to the correct type and increasing the boldness a tad]

[Edit 24/03/16. Image Removed to prevent illicit printing -- will replace with even lower-res version when I have time]

Attach file:



jpg  genuine.jpg (185.03 KB)
228_53c0965537d16.jpg 1574X620 px

Posted on: 2014/7/11 18:57

Edited by Stu on 2014/7/12 3:40:41
Edited by Stu on 2014/7/13 0:49:36
Edited by Stu on 2014/7/13 3:21:06
Edited by Stu on 2014/7/13 3:23:14
Edited by Stu on 2014/7/13 4:56:18
Edited by Stu on 2014/7/18 6:35:14
Edited by Stu on 2014/7/18 18:01:15
Edited by Stu on 2016/3/16 21:53:21
Edited by Stu on 2016/3/16 22:00:22
Edited by Stu on 2016/3/23 18:21:05
Edited by Stu on 2016/3/23 18:23:33


Re: Recommendations for Tolkien facsimile dust jackets
Shirrif
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
From Queenstown, New Zealand
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 897
Offline
Well, 25+ hours of photoshopping and I ended up with something I was happy enough with. Anyone contemplating of converting a 4th Ed Jacket into a 1st, my advice would be -- don't!! Start with a 3rd Edition as there are an order of magnitude less changes required.

The local print place ran it off for me on semi-gloss paper on their wide printer for $15 and I'm very pleased with the result. $65 all in for a 1st/4th in a correct impression facsimile Dust jacket feels like decent enough value. If I was going to print it again, I'd probably enlarge it by 1.5mm vertically to lose the white bands top and bottom, which seem to be cut off on the original (as presumably the original jacket printing was a tiny bit too big for the book). I'd also adjust the blue a bit further and change to CYMK to get a bit more colour accuracy from the print place.

If anyone wants the 300dpi file for the jacket, it is a about 7Mb, so just drop me a PM with your email address.

Thanks to Trotter for his assistance with this little project.

(Note the pictures don't show the final version -- I did another 10 hours or so of editing after I printed it....)

Attach file:



jpg  photo 2.JPG (69.20 KB)
228_53be05b306510.jpg 700X652 px

jpg  photo.JPG (112.30 KB)
228_53be05c2a02b0.jpg 1000X579 px

Posted on: 2014/7/9 20:19

Edited by Stu on 2014/7/9 20:40:55
Edited by Stu on 2014/7/9 20:56:54
Edited by Stu on 2014/7/11 18:38:07


Re: Recommendations for Tolkien facsimile dust jackets
Shirrif
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
From Queenstown, New Zealand
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 897
Offline
Probably worth mentioning as well that Mark is not the only supplier of jackets that are incorrect, as it seems that there may have been some re-scanning of the bad facsimiles in order to create new ones. If you are in the market for a jacket from *any supplier of jackets* you need to check the runes in the bottom right and/or directly above and below the spine. These will be completely different from that of a legit UK jacket.

There are several other faults on the jackets (such as the sizing of spine text, the cutoff point of the main image, noticeable on the clouds at the top right of the front, the cutoff point of the picture at the bottom), but these are the dead obvious* ones.

(* So dead obvious that I initially tried to copy them when creating my jacket! Thanks to Trotter for setting me straight as to what was right/wrong when I brought the differences to his attention).

Posted on: 2014/7/8 16:12



 Top
« 1 ... 66 67 68 (69) 70 71 72 ... 171 »




© 2015 TolkienGuide.com and respective authors. Contact Us