Login

Or
Register Now


Already have an account?
Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost Your Password?
Main Menu
Collector's Guide Table of Contents
Recent Visitors

tolkienbrasil
1 hour 36 minutes ago

Karl
1 hour 39 minutes ago

wellinghall
3 hours 36 minutes ago

Trotter
4 hours 37 minutes ago

laurel
4 hours 40 minutes ago

Stu
9 hours 33 minutes ago

Khamûl
9 hours 58 minutes ago

Jlong
14 hours 6 minutes ago


« 1 ... 91 92 93 (94) 95 96 97 ... 122 »


Re: Why????????????????
Home away from home
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
From Queenstown, New Zealand
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 642
Offline
And it goes without saying that I find none of these negative attitudes here on this site


Damn, I do my very hardest to display all kinds of negative attitudes and you didn't even notice!!!

I'll try a bit harder - How about : "The movies were indeed utterly awful and I look down at the kinds of people that like them and wonder what it would be like to be amongst the company of such asinine gutter-trash?" ?

S. :)

Posted on: 2011/7/17 18:09


Re: George Allen & Unwin: A Remembrancer on eBay
Home away from home
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
From Queenstown, New Zealand
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 642
Offline

Khamul wrote:
Well, from everyone who does not have a copy of this book, thanks for that Trotter!

BH


Seconded - I really hope they do another printing; I will certainly be in the queue to purchase one if they do.

Posted on: 2011/7/16 22:28


Re: Why?
Home away from home
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
From Queenstown, New Zealand
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 642
Offline

Trotter wrote:
Yes it does


Anyone of course has the right to be offended by something or not approve of something. My point was about the human tendency to make presumptions regarding what the dead might think (if they weren't dead). IMHO, this process involves attributing our own opinions to the dead in order to bolster the validity of said opinions. Surely it is enough to say "*I* do not approve", rather than "Tolkien would not have approved" and let that opinion stand on its own merit.

In the case of this bridge, given the utter and total crap that his been (willingly) licensed in Tolkien's name, I hardly think a bridge (which is presumably a useful thing to those who will cross it) is worth getting too worried about. I imagine the estate would weigh in and kill their party anyway.

Just my two-cents (or pennies) - it isn't my intent to offend any of the living

Stu

Posted on: 2011/7/16 22:22


Re: Why?????????
Home away from home
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
From Queenstown, New Zealand
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 642
Offline

Dior wrote:
Terrible...I don't think Tolkien would have approved.

Dior



I always smile a bit at comments about whether [insert name of arbitrary dead person] would have approved of something. I tend to think that we should worry less about what we imagine the dead might think about something and concentrate on what the living think. Once you die, you lose the right to approve/disapprove of anything from that point right until the end of the universe. I suspect that one of the best things about dying is you no longer have to give a toss.

Personally, I couldn't care less who the bridge is named after. No one is harmed, either way, so what does it matter?

Stu

Posted on: 2011/7/16 3:39


Re: The Wonders of eBay
Home away from home
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
From Queenstown, New Zealand
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 642
Offline
But these tapes are a LIMITED EDITION - They must be worth having. And it also seems like these tapes (or "readins") were minted in 1859, so they are very early examples of the art.

Posted on: 2011/7/11 10:12



 Top
« 1 ... 91 92 93 (94) 95 96 97 ... 122 »