Login

Or
Register Now


Already have an account?
Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost Your Password?
Main Menu
Collector's Guide Table of Contents
Recent Visitors

yee256
55 seconds ago

Findegil
13 minutes ago

onthetrail
52 minutes ago

Trotter
54 minutes ago

Stu
3 hours 25 minutes ago

Lawrence_C
4 hours 35 minutes ago

Tolkieniano
5 hours 5 minutes ago

Aelfwine
10 hours 27 minutes ago

Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users



« 1 2 (3)


Re: Baynton, Temple, or Chelsea for Bookbinding?
Shirrif
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 1428
Offline
If it was a Hobbit I was after, I'd buy a nice condition first (without jacket), stick a facsimile jacket on it (which cost nothing and adds no value, but looks nice), and put it in a nice leather-bound solander case.

But if you really want a rebind, go ahead, but have the expectation that the market for unmolested copies is greater than the market for rebinds.

Posted on: 2017/11/5 12:18


Re: Baynton, Temple, or Chelsea for Bookbinding?
Home away from home
Joined:
2007/4/29 5:29
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 679
Offline
generally, I agree with the posts above - with the addition that it's not a good idea to buy a book as an investment. I buy books because I like them.

But to answer one of your questions - Bayntun's is an old-established firm, and the bindings are excellent. Temple is a new company, relatively speaking. I've never had any of my books bound, but they've made some boxes for me, and I'm very satified with their work. Their bindings look good. Ian Barnes is the owner - he's approachable, and very professional.

I haven't seen any of Chelsea's bindings in the flesh, as it were. Years ago, I heard from a book-dealer thT some staff went to work there from Sangorski Sutcliffe when they ceased trading.

Posted on: 2017/11/5 14:16


Re: Baynton, Temple, or Chelsea for Bookbinding?
Shirrif
Joined:
2008/8/10 2:07
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 1428
Offline


I would like a rebound book that will continue to hold its market value (I know that I shouldn't expect any price appreciation since the popularity of Tolkien's work is somewhat dwindling).


For me, this is a problem with what you are trying to achieve. No one can tell you whether a book will lose value, hold value or gain value. The book market is notoriously fickle, and what is fashionable one year may not be so fashionable the next (or the converse).

All I can say is that from personal experience, my books are - without doubt - worth less than I paid for them (which is no big deal as they aren't worth that much and I'll never sell them anyway). The more expensive the items you are purchasing, the more losing significant sums of money becomes a risk.

It feels from reading your posts that investment is always on the back of your mind, and an expectation that certain names/brands associated with a book will guarantee a preservation of value. I just don't think this is the case. In the case of rebinds, a nice rebind is probably easier to sell than a rubbish rebind, bit I don't see anyone chasing after work done by any specific company. That said, I may move in different circles!

Posted on: 2017/11/5 15:37


Re: Baynton, Temple, or Chelsea for Bookbinding?
Not too shy to talk
Joined:
2017/9/3 3:16
Group:
Shirefolk
Posts: 33
Offline
Thank you fellow Tolkienists for all the sage advices!

Posted on: 2017/11/21 1:24



« 1 2 (3)



You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You can vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]


© 2018 TolkienGuide.com and respective authors. Contact Us