The Fall of Arthur for Kindle on Amazon.com
Login
Username:

Password:

remember me

Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Collector's Guide Table of Contents
Recent Visitors

Stu
53 minutes ago

wellinghall
1 hour 37 minutes ago

Khaműl
2 hours 2 minutes ago

laurel
4 hours 8 minutes ago

soldbyshortsale
4 hours 41 minutes ago

Karl
4 hours 50 minutes ago

Trotter
5 hours 26 minutes ago

Jlong
5 hours 53 minutes ago

Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users



« 1 (2) 3 »


Re: Tolkien Map
Shirrif
Joined:
2007/8/16 4:56
From Scotland
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 1293
Offline
Can we assume the story of Angie talking to Rayner, and he running it by CT (btw, hope the old gent had a good 86th the other day...), is rubbish?

BH

Posted on: 2010/11/23 16:09


Re: Tolkien Map
Thain
Joined:
2006/5/26 20:36
From California, USA
Group:
Thain
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 999
Offline
I found it funny that CT was "of the opinion" that the ink was his father's from a fax transmission.

Posted on: 2010/11/23 23:52
_________________
- Jeremy


Re: Tolkien Map
Shirrif
Joined:
2006/6/5 22:04
From Essex, UK
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Shirrif
Posts: 1247
Offline
This may be as reliable as the discredited claim that CT keeps wild boars in his garden to keep away fans, but I have heard that CT will only correspond by fax with his publishers, hence that would be the only way that he would have seen a copy of the item.

Posted on: 2010/11/24 5:04


Re: Tolkien Map
Home away from home
Joined:
2007/2/10 7:19
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 162
Offline

Urulókë wrote:
I found it funny that CT was "of the opinion" that the ink was his father's from a fax transmission.


That's a good one! I hadn't caught that myself. Very funny.

Posted on: 2010/11/24 6:20


Re: Tolkien Map
Home away from home
Joined:
2006/6/4 4:17
From UK
Group:
Shirefolk
Fellowship
Posts: 314
Offline
I have known Angie for many years and knew the story of it being shown to Rayner to get his opinion long before the item was sold by Daeron's, so that much is true. IIRC Rayner said that it was more than likely JRRT, but it was difficult to be entirely certain because JRRT's handwriting could vary enormously.

The book was "rediscovered" and bought for very little in a second hand bookshop I think, so not a deliberate fake made for profit anyway.

Posted on: 2010/11/24 12:40



« 1 (2) 3 »



You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You can vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]