TolkienGuide.com
Powered by Collectors Since 2006
Sign In
TolkienGuide.com
Important links:

Guide to Tolkien's Letters
(Nominated for 2026 Tolkien Society Award)
-
Guide to Tolkien Calendars
-
Winner of the 2019 Tolkien Society award for Best Website

Fellowship of the Ring - a UK first edition with blue covers???

13 Sep, 2025 (edited)
2025-9-13 12:27:40 AM UTC

Hi All,
I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this. In the 1950s my mother bought the 3 volumes of the The Lord of the Rings and they have remained on the bookshelf in the family home for 70 years until my dad died a couple of months ago (my mum pre-deceased him).

I retrieved the volumes as I suspected they were first editions. None of them have dust jackets. The Two Towers and The Return of the King definitely are - first edition, first impression. But The Fellowship of the Ring is a mystery. It is in the worst condition of the three. In terms of publication date it is right - 1954. Printed by Jarrold & Sons. No impression information so possibly first impression. But the covers are blue, not red! (It is definitely not the American edition which is blue - it is Allen & Unwin). Plus, the pagination is not standard - 423pp, not 424. Also, it is very slightly smaller than the other two volumes in terms of height and width, and the margins are very slightly smaller.

I have scoured the internet exhaustively and can find no mention of a UK first edition with any of these features. I can absolutely vouch for the provenance in terms of this being in my family since the 1950s. It is not some kind of fake. I took it to a reputable antiquarian bookshop (Tombland Books in Norwich). The lady there was very knowledgeable. She confirmed the other volumes were "right" in all particulars but was mystified as to the Fellowship volume. She too could find no reference to such an edition.

She noted that the other two volumes had a "Times Library" stamp inside the back cover, indicating that my mother probably bought them via The Times Library in Wigmore Street which in the 1950s was a (now defunct) lending library cum book club where you could buy the latest publications at reduced rates. The bookseller suggested that perhaps this book club produced its own edition of the Fellowship, although she had never seen any others or any reference to it, and The Fellowship is the one book of the three that has no "Times Library" stamp in it.

I have looked through the standard bibliographical work, W.G Hammond's "J.R.R. Tolkien : a descriptive bibliography" online and can find no reference to such an edition. Yet it exists!

Can anyone shed any light on this?

6261_68c5440b84c7a.jpg 1280X720 px

6261_68c5440b84ce6.jpg 1280X720 px

6261_68c5440b84f52.jpg 1280X720 px

6261_68c5442754c55.jpg 1280X720 px
13 Sep, 2025
2025-9-13 12:42:09 AM UTC
Hi Conrad, and welcome to the site. Can you share some pictures here?
13 Sep, 2025
2025-9-13 6:17:05 AM UTC
Without seeing any pictures, it appears to be a lending library rebind. These were done in the 1950's as a means of identifying the books were from the library.

I have a 1954 2nd Impression from Boots Lending Library, these were done in all kinds of different colours to indicate the genre of the book, though mine is red. I have seen green, blue, etc.

10_68c50c5da0abf.jpg 6000X4000 px
13 Sep, 2025
2025-9-13 10:22:38 AM UTC
Thanks for your reply. Yes, I should have uploaded some images with my query. I have done so now. They're not very clear, but I hope they show the last page as 423 (not 424 as standard) the dilapidated blue covers and the title not in a circle on the spine but with straight gilt lines above and below, the blue covers and title page. If this gets us any further or you want any more images please let me know.
13 Sep, 2025
2025-9-13 10:30:35 AM UTC
Thanks for your reply. I have put some images on, which I should have done in the first place. I agree that a lending library rebind seems to be the most likely explanation, but would that account for the difference in pagination (423 rather than 424)? How many pages does your Boots copy have? Also, from what you know, is there no other indication of a lending library rebind other than the different covers? The actual pages (not just the covers) are slightly smaller in my copy and the experienced bookseller I consulted said the margins are slightly different on the pages. These features would seem to indicate a different layout rather than just a rebind.

Grateful for any further thoughts. Is a contemporary rebound copy still considered a first edition? Is its value much less than an original?

13 Sep, 2025
2025-9-13 10:50:16 AM UTC
I am not sure what you mean by it only has 423 pages, if you count the reverse of page 423, you get 424 pages.

It is still a first edition/first impression but a Library copy and that will have some impact on the value of the book.

I would also find a local book binder and talk to them about getting all three books rebound, this will give you a much more attractive set to keep or sell in the future.
13 Sep, 2025
2025-9-13 11:13:12 AM UTC
Re the 423 pages, I quote from Sotheby's guidance on identifying first editions:

"The dust jacket, designed by Tolkien, should include the price “21s net” and display the correct spelling of “Frodo” on page 424. In some later impressions, this name appears as “Fodo” due to a printing error, which is not present in the first edition."

The bookseller I consulted also picked up on this point. It should have 424 pages of text. My copy is not missing any pages, but it has 423.

As regards rebinding, does it really add value? I though collectors wanted books in original, unrestored condition?
13 Sep, 2025
2025-9-13 11:31:23 AM UTC

Conrad Jones wrote:

Re the 423 pages, I quote from Sotheby's guidance on identifying first editions:

"The dust jacket, designed by Tolkien, should include the price “21s net” and display the correct spelling of “Frodo” on page 424. In some later impressions, this name appears as “Fodo” due to a printing error, which is not present in the first edition."

The bookseller I consulted also picked up on this point. It should have 424 pages of text. My copy is not missing any pages, but it has 423.

As regards rebinding, does it really add value? I though collectors wanted books in original, unrestored condition?

Page 424 of the 1st Impression contains the addresses of the George Allen & Unwin offices and their Colophon. It is not numbered as 424, but is the reverse of the last numbered page of the book, 423. Hence 424 pages, I can see from your photo that your copy does have 424 pages.

The Sotheby's article was discussed here https://www.tolkienguide.com/modules/n ... t_id=62411#forumpost62411 and contains many inaccuracies and should not be relied upon.

Collectors do indeed want books in original, unrestored condition, however your library rebind is not original, unrestored condition.
13 Sep, 2025
2025-9-13 12:13:35 PM UTC
Thanks, that's very helpful.
Jump to Last
All original content © by the submitting authors. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Contact Us